Mid-range prosumer cameras

Time to look at cameras in the mid-range, which means $500-$1,200 (not including tax, shipping). My first urge was to keep the mid-range price below $1,000, but that left few choices. I like the low-end (under $500) camcorders for their size and ease of use, however, there seems to be a trend away from some professional necessities, such as mike input on both low and medium range cameras. And who knows what they might eliminate next – manual iris and focus. Let’s face it: most folks just want to point and shoot and they want the simplest and best deal they can get. (Frankly I don’t understand why the camera companies don’t get rid of the special effects first.)

If you need a review, go to “How to Choose a Camera” for more details/definitions about terms and features.

When you pay more for a camera, expect more. It should be sturdier, definitely have manual controls, better lens, more/higher count CCDs. In order to make my list below, the camera must have a mike input, headset out, zoom of at least 10x (I wanted 15x or better, but again that doesn’t appear to be possible), and manual iris, focus, and white balance. It also, obviously, has to fit in the price range of $500-$1,200 and take mini-DV tapes. I do not generally like cameras sold as part of a kit: unless you are familiar with exactly what is in the kit, you’re taking a chance that someone else knows what you want. Finally…I’m not looking at low light ability, interchangable lenses or other features you may want. This is just a quick look-see to find out what you can get in a certain price range.

The lowest priced camera to meet my requirements, the Panasonic PV-GS500, has three 1/4.7 chips rated at 1.07 megapixels each. There is a mike jack, but strangely enough – no headphone jack. I’d like to know how Panasonic expects you to monitor audio (and I’m willing to bet it’s through the yellow AV port – confirm this before purchasing). Cost today at B&H (1/4/07) is $900.

Next up the price range is the very professional looking Panasonic AG-DVC7. It only has a single 1/4″ 680k CCD – a step up from the 1/6 inch CCDs in the under $500 crowd, but not as good as the Panasonic PV-GS500. It has both microphone & headset jacks and a 15x zoom. If you want a mid-range camera that doesn’t look like a handycam, check this one out. Price is $1,000.

Now for the suprise: that’s it with mid-range camcorders with mike inputs/headset jacks and manual controls. Even at this price the manufacturers are not including the ability to record clean sound. It seems that the general public values quality in pictures…but is still clueless about the need for good audio.

If we push the price up we can look at the Panasonic AGDVC20, the JVC GR-HD1, and the Sony HDR-HC7 1080i – all for under $1,500. Still disappointing though…


4 thoughts on “Mid-range prosumer cameras

  1. There is a lot made in the videojournalismsphere (how’s that for a word) about the importance of good audio quality — but if consumes are not valuing it in the cameras that they’re spending hundreds on, how import is it to them in free online video? I’m not so much questioning the need for good audio as just saying — if the big manufactures have found consumers don’t value it, how do we know they think it’s important in the video we produce for them to watch?

  2. Howard
    I love that you question everything. Maybe good audio isn’t important – or as important as we like to think it is. Or perhaps the consumers really haven’t listened to enough bad audio to realize how difficult it is to hear. Tell you what – I’ve got a couple of clips of my daughter shot just for this purpuse Let me post them and see if they draw any comments. (And maybe it’s just my old ears having trouble hearing the muted sound from the on-cam mikes)

  3. Pingback: Good audio, bad audio « VideoJournalism

  4. It will make you want to bring out your inner, gritty artist, and stomp in style, conjuring up
    your favorite Girl-Drummer in a Raucous Garage
    Band alternate universe you. For men, ugg boots are available in so
    neutral colors that look so nice and elegant. No make any
    difference how cautious you are although wearing your
    UGG boots, at some level you are bound to get them possibly scuffed, marked, or dirtied.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s